Games Admin Posted by Xavi (as xavidp - admin) Fri 06 Jul, 2007 05:57 GMT-0000 posts: 33 ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ Use this thread to discuss the page:: Games Admin
Posted by Xavier de Pedro Fri 06 Jul, 2007 06:14 GMT-0000 posts: 57 ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ Gary, unluckily we've had a confusion due to that issue of renaming pages to singular that was performed weeks ago. Games Admin (and the other Games pages) were renamed (I guess, or just created again as blank pages???) to singular form, and those were the ones I filled in yesterday already and copied over the -odt-.pdf file 😕 (they were the ones I saw at Documentation structure): Games Game User Game Admin Game Details Could you merge your content (if any) to the pre-existing pages in the structure? (we should all look for in the Documentation structure first, before this kind of confusion happens again... due to the "singular - plural" name issue; and we should always leave a "redirect" (with REDIRECT plugin) on the other page to the one which hold the documentation, whichever it is singular or plural... Old pages: Games User, Games Admin, Games Details.
Posted by Gary Cunningham-Lee Fri 06 Jul, 2007 07:12 GMT-0000 posts: 36 ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ In my opinion, these pages should have plural-form names, because the feature's name is "Games", not "Game". I see there is still strangeness on the Features page. "Freetags" and "Charts" seem correct to me. I thought there was agreement that natural language was the way to go on this. Sorry for making trouble, but that's the way I see it. -- Gary
Posted by Xavi (as xavidp - admin) Mon 09 Jul, 2007 06:25 GMT-0000 posts: 33 ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ I agree, Gary, as you know, and we talked on irc. Possible solutions I see: pages are re-named to natural language. (Category -> Categories) no-natural language pages are created (if needed) with a redirect to natural language pages. in the mean time, missing important natural language pages can be created (if needed) with a redirect to the existing page? (Categories -> Category) ? But for my own likes, I would prefer that we documenters invest time in filling important gaps in the documentation (stub pages for modules, plugins, mods, ...), previous to investing too much time into this internal renaming feature. (my personal opinion, of course)
